The functional test of Leonhart

 We carried out a 'Functional Test' for Leonhart High Caffeine Hot Chocolate to see the practical effects on concentration and anxiety

Actual implementation

 

 

 

Number of participants: 19 registered, 1 drop-out, 16 eligible dataset

8:30 – 9:00: Participants registered for the study. Info collected: 
Demographic (age, gender)
Stimulant-consuming habit (coffee, cigarettes, alcohol)
Health conditions (menstruation, medical – neurological – psychiatric disorders, family’s psychiatric history)
Stress level
 

9:00 – 9:30 & 10:30 – 11:00:
Participants perform the cognitive-function games online, before and after consumption.

 

Name of Game

Cognitive function being tested

How to play

Data collected (that are useful for analysis)

N-Back task

Memory, attention

Participants must tap the screen when the 2-letter-ago appears (e.g. A – M – A )

Trial type, score (only count right answer), match, miss, false alarm, reaction time

Sustained Attention to Response Task

Attention, information process

Participants must tap the screen when numbers appear. Except for number 3

Trial type, score, reaction time

Wisconsin Card Sorting Inspired Task

Reasoning, information process

Participants must match the card with 1 of 4 given cards, by either shape – color – number. The participant must figure out the matching rule.

Reaction time, score

9:30 – 10:30: participants taste the product and give feedbacks on taste/aroma. All participants take Leonhart sample – with the same ratio of Caffeine and Ashwagandha. 
Data collected: 
Taste and aroma preference


Analysis – register survey

Demographic info of participants     

                           

Stress level of participants

 

Coffee usage frequency of participants
 

 

Tobacco usage frequency of participants

 

Alcohol usage frequency of participants

 

Health conditions

In terms of health conditions, no participants are under any medical, neurological, psychiatric conditions, or having family members being treated for these conditions
 

Analysis – Cognitive game results - Nback

Game 1: N-Back task

Q1: Did the overall accuracy and memory improve after taking Leonhart (demonstrated by % of total score)?

There is a 3.75% non-significant (p-value>0.05) increase in both accuracy and memory (calculating by % of score over maximum 50 points)

Q2: Did the nervousness reduce after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by increase in % of correct matches and reduction of % false alarm click?

There is a significant 5.875% increase in correct matches
There is a non-significant 1.125% increase in false alarm
-> relatively the same, no impacts

Q3: Did the alertness and focus increase after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by a decrease in reaction time?

There is a non-significant 67.37 ms decrease in reaction time

Q4: Did the memory and accuracy increase, demonstrated by reducing reaction time of correct matches?

There is a non-significant 74.34 ms decrease in reaction time

Game 2: SART
Q1: Did the overall attention and information processing improve after taking Leonhart (demonstrated by % of total score)?

There is a non-significant 0.625% increase in attention and information processing (calculating by % of score over maximum 150 points)

Q2: Did information processing increase after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by a decrease in reaction time?

There is a non-significant 52.75 ms decrease in mean reaction time

Q3: Did alertness increase after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by a decrease in reaction time of Go trials (trials that the participants were allowed to press the button)?

There is a non-significant 56.47 ms decrease in mean reaction time

Game 3: WCST
Q1: Did the overall logical processing improve after taking Leonhart (demonstrated by % of total score)?

There is a significant 10.125% increase in logical processing (calculating by % of score over maximum 50 points)

Q2: Did the logical processing speed improve after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by an decrease of reaction time of correct matches?

There is a significant 566.69 ms decrease in logical processing speed (calculating by mean reaction time of correct matches)

Q3: Did the logical processing speed improve after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by an decrease of reaction time to find the next card-matching rule when the rule is switched?

There is a significant 740.63 ms decrease in logical processing speed (calculating by mean reaction time)

Q4: Did the logical processing improve after taking Leonhart, demonstrated by an decrease of wrong match and time-out?

There is a significant decrease of 5.06 wrong trials between before-after taking Leonhart

 

Get Articles In Your Inbox how you can MASTER YOUR DAY

Your cart (0 Product)